Being away from home for the first time presents problems and these are often made into larger than life emergencies. The idea of new being strange was a constant worry for myself, the parents and the accompanying teachers. The number of pre-trip emails I received from parents alerting me to the idea of "homesickness" was more than expected, and I suppose some of the students did suffer. But I think that more parents were prone. But it makes me wonder who they didn't trust, the teachers or the student? I know that in the preparation stages, we considered so many scenarios and worst case situations that I carried around a weighty tomb of "vital information" for all students.
I know the temptation of many parents was to follow and step in if and/or when they thought things were going 'pear shaped', and at pick up yesterday I actually had one couple tell me they were there following us for three days. But such a gesture could easily have backfired and reinforced dependency rather than promoting independence and self-reliance. It appears that the parents did not have as much faith in their children as I did, and I know that stepping in would have undone all of the previous gains. I had unannounced visits by parents during breakfast and of course the ever present electronic chatter confirming a case of sniffles or a slightly raised temperature or ..... I recall the expression "being babied" used in my youth, but in these times it would probably be considered to be inappropriate, even if correct.
We managed a packed schedule that saw tired but content students arrive back at the hotel each night. I fully understand that chatting occurred in rooms after the advertised "lights out" time each day, but I also know that many strategies and tips were shared. This us one of the most pleasing aspects of the so called "free time" built into all school based trips - it tends to be informal chats on how they survived the ordeals of the day. The students actually teach each other better than we or their parents ever could, and come out of the experience as more confident and responsible people. As group leaders we let the children try first before we step in. I was providing encouragement rather than immediate solutions, especially for the few cases of homesickness or teething problems caused by suddenly having a roommate. A stock reply of "how proud will you be when you meet mum & dad next week knowing that you have done this!" Each time I used it, it had the positive impact.
The growth experienced by each child varied, but I was more than pleased with the growth of the more coddled members of the group. One lad in particular stood out. Initially he was a little lost without the "comforting sound of helicopter blades", but he soon started to experiment with his new found freedom. I think he was a little surprised by the reaction of his peers. But overall, he soon quickly learned that he had the skills and support needed to be independent. I wonder what will happen when the shackles are again applied?
Children are never too young to develop support networks, and this trip proved that to be a fact. The idea of looking after the room mate was stressed, but not overly so. As I tell parents at our introduction evening, it is a chance for students to make a mistake in a safe environment. The fact that this sort of activity is common in kindergarten in Germany, makes me wonder why we feel that children are so delicate and incapable of looking after themselves? I think it is more the parents who suffer, as can attested by the constant barrage of texts and emails from one parent although her son was coping in his new environment. It was a case of imagination overtaking reality, with the silence from camp being construed as a problem or emergency rather than a success.
The sad question that follows, is how long this feeling of growth and accomplishment will last now the children are back in the protection of the parents? After their performance on the program I would consider them all winners, but I wonder if that will be an accurate description after they have been back in the "safety" of their homes for any period of time?